iPhone exclusivity may come to an end – AT&T executives

Created by hasan.kamal under iPhone


AT&T Mobility CEO Ralph de la Vega released a rather controversial yet understandable statement regarding the exclusivity of the iPhone to AT&T’s network. He mentioned that the portfolio of phones and services extend beyond Apple’s iPhone. Surprisingly, it makes sense. Apple is still a very new entrant into the cellphone market in comparison to industry giants such as Nokia, Samsung, LG, Sony-Ericsson, and other Taiwanese competitors. Apple’s cult-like following and design elements are what have been the primary success factors for the phone itself.

Ralph’s statements are not necessarily shocking when placed in light of the new phones that have been developed to compete with the iPhone. The Palm Pre and HTC’s offerings alone offer technologies that are similar to the iPhone at price points that are extremely competitive. Apple has yet to develop a product that will overshadow the success of the iPhone. Firmware upgrades and improved wireless connectivity will only go so far in dealing with the competition that the iPhone faces. In addition to this, the exclusivity of the iPhone can only extend till the network supports the technology requirements of the existing AT&T network. With networks moving towards 5G capabilities, AT&T clearly needs to diversify to support the new phones that are being offered by competitors. As open technology standards move towards a standardized set of features on phones, Apple needs to remain ahead of the curve through it research and development.

Apple’s fortunes have been primarily focused on a cult-like fan following along with a matchless integration of the App Store and iTunes. Google’s recent capital expenditure on specialized technology firms which include SEO and social marketing specialists is indicative of revamping the Android Marketplace. With such firms onboard to revamp and develop new technologies, it seems that the Android Marketplace will soon be able to compete more efficiently and effectively in comparison to the App Store. This is a serious factor for AT&T to consider when the iPhone begins to saturate the smartphone market. By remaining excessively exclusive to Apple, AT&T may narrow its market unnecessarily missing out on opportunities to challenge other service providers in the United States. Resultantly, AT&T should begin revamping its product lines to address customers that require needs that are unable to be fulfilled by the iPhone.

Apple’s primary focus has always been a premium product priced at a hefty premium. Considering that smartphones now have become a necessity for most consumers, many consumers are still looking for bargains online for phones and services. The pricing strategy of AT&T and Apple may force potentially lucrative consumers away from their product lines and move towards other service providers. AT&T should look to address problem by maintaining a fairly diverse product line that covers the new and growing OS platforms.

The Google-Verizon alliance is a living example of how companies can easily challenge established giants. With a network capability that is significantly stronger than AT&T and a loyal customer base, it seems that Verizon and Google are more than poised to take over the smartphone market. Coupled with significant capital expenditure that Google has done in the recent weeks along with the Sprint-Palm collaboration, Apple’s days are numbered. Unless rapid product development and successful leverage of the existing brand image are the only ways that Apple can maintain its leadership in the smartphone arena. AT&T also needs to capitalize on this leverage and build on the impetus to promote its brand amongst consumers and handset manufacturers. By tapping into new markets, both Apple and AT&T can easily capture new market segments and remain competitive amongst other service providers.

Do you think that AT&T should start looking at other manufacturers and platforms now or should they wait till the iPhone reaches market saturation? Is AT&T in a strong enough position to attract handset manufacturers or should it wait to see the impact of the Google-Verizon alliance on its’ product lines? Leave your comments or thoughts below.

:, , , , , ,

3 Comments for this entry


  • Anonymous

    Since when did AT&T ever say they were only going to support iPhone? Seems like you have it backwards.

    Also, blanket statements about the iPhone being priced at a premium are no longer accurate given the hefty discounts available – it would be better to quote actual prices. Given the marketshare, I don’t think their marketing is limited to the “cult like following”… It appears that the market of cults for other platforms, such as Palm, BlackBerry, etc.. have been chipped away. The claims of the potential for Android are still as of yet unrealized… the potential is there, but until quality and quantity of apps for Android ramp up, it’ll be the laggard. Verizon may help in the US – time will tell.

  • umair.shah

    Dear Anonymous,

    Thanks for the comment. AT&T senior management changed Ralph’s statement almost immediately during the course of the interview.

    Simply put, even after the success of the iPhone, experts (from Fortune companies and investors, source below) place the profit margin on the iPhone close to 60%. That’s a comfortable profit margin for any consumer electronics device.
    [60% margin, Source: http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/07/29/report-iphone-margins-are-nearly-60/

    Secondly, contract phones aside – iPhones are still being sold through Apple Stores across the world. Apple receives a hefty profit margin through those channels as well. In addition, iPhones receive a sizable subsidy from AT&T for the subsidized rates on the phones that are sold through contract as means of acquiring new customers.
    (Source: http://www.tgdaily.com/consumer-electronics-features/42986-apple-makes-420-on-each-iphone-sold)

    Thirdly, if you read our other articles, almost all of them discuss the pros and cons of the other platforms. With regards to Android, there is constant mention of the potential yet a lack of momentum to get app development going on the platform itself. Check out the Android section of our blog.

    Again, thanks for the comment and keep visiting us.

    Cheers

  • Richard Dizmang

    My view is that both Apple and AT&T would be better served by opening competition, and even encouraging it. AT&T gains from additional hand sets available to customers who might not be in the market for an iPhone, and Apple gains by making their phone available to customers for whom AT&T’s network is not available. If AT&T can’t compete on price/features for a customers business, then they should look at why that is, and improve their business model to become competitive. Same with Apple’s handset. Open competition breeds “best of class” outcomes on both sides.

1 Trackback or Pingback for this entry

Leave a Reply